Sunday, December 29, 2013

Madha Yaanai Kootam - Review


Production              :  GV Prakash Kumar
Direction                 :  Vikram Sugumaran
Cinematography     :  Ragul Dharuman
Music                      :  NR Raghunandan
Lyricist                     :  Ekadesi

To the ordinary movie buff, it is easy to relate this movie with Agni Natchatram, Kizhakku Seemayile, Thevar Magan or Raktha Charitra. To the layman, it is a emotional drama where revenge and loyalties set in motion a chain of events depicted in the movie. I could sense a lot of Mahabharata – which translates to real life event and real people, not some idealized commercial BS. Any story line from this Epic would make a good drama. This movie is plain and simple brilliance – thanks to the director-writer, surprisingly new acting talents and I should add a good lyricist. Music to me showed talent and inexperience.

Talk about uncermonious starts, this one should tops the lists. It starts with a village slang which is difficult to comprehend and the setting is a death of an important guy in the village. It starts as a narrative of his life thru some koothu artists. Takes a few minutes to align our ears, by which time we missed some dialogs. But nothing that reduced the potency of the story that followed.

Lot of taboos broken in this product – all new faces, a weak opportune villain, everyone has some failing, revenge is the strongest emotion portrayed (while containing bloodiness to very few scenes, thus avoiding repulsion). I was surprised with the first half of the movie – the amount of information packed within. There were atleast 8-10 characters – all their profiles were developed in depth and the stage was set by the interval for what then appeared to a gory blood bath. But the story developed further, loyalties changed and tested. Story jumped a few more unexpected hoops, with minimal blood spilled at the end. Felt more real world than fiction.

Climax again reiterated the fact that life moves on. There is remorse and regret in some characters, there is a greater sense of revenge and vested interests in others - a perfect base for a sequel. Direction, dialog and screenplay were awesome to say the least. Thanks partly to the director, the new comers showed so much finnesse and added so much to their characters. This could have easily been a 3.5 hour movie – had it not be for the village slang which was most direct and conveyed the maximum meaning with the minimum possible words. There were experiments done on cinematography – fixed camera angles, long uncut shots to mention a few. Music and BGM were ordinary and probably the only low point for me. Lyrics fit the melody beautifully well – simplicity of words and a nice fit to the rhyme - felt hints of kannadasan(me a total fanboy).

Flawless and concise first attempt. Hats off to the producer and director.

PS: saw the review in The Hindu – totally outrageous, stupid and opinionated. Does the reviewer have any sense of style or technique? May be he walked into the theater to escape a miserable family...

Monday, August 05, 2013

Vishnu Guptha (350 - 283 BC) - Part 2

Critical analysis of the man has been pending for a while now.

This was a man with limitless wisdom born in very troubled times. There were corruption, disorder and murder all round him. Value systems was heavily degraded. What he saw around him were culturally similar states warring constantly and lacking cohesion and unity to thwart an outside attack. He had a dream, a dream which was centuries ahead of his time - the dream of a unified Bharath.

What set him apart is his determination and cold intellect. An intellect that was not clouded by his emotions and well honed with years of hard work. I took some time to read Machiavelli's prince, sun tzu's art of war and other similar works. But nothing comes close to the breadth and depth of state policy descibed in Kautilya's books. From the poorest of the peasants to the emperor of the state, everyone's duties and rights were elucidated no neatly. There were rewards and penalties for various judicial matters - be it civil, commercial or military.

Since he knew that corruption, he had put in place an extensive network of spies. Everyone was being watched and being reported on. Even the watchers. Ever state has to get rid of dirt and it is not a very clean job in itself. There were ways to deal with political adversaries, enemy spies, the prince/queen who decides to harm the king. Rules of assassinations, rules of war, rules of how to bring up a future king, everything was clearly laid out. 

There are certain difficult choices and sacrifices to be made for the greater good or a society. Beyond a point morality thins where safety/stability becomes paramount. Some thing broach ethics in such a way that we can debate for eternity without results. Crisis situations which you don't see everyday, but which poses a moral dilemma in the face of immediate danger. Clarity in such matters and help to make hard decisions is what Chanakya gave us. That is what sets him a good ten steps higher than any of the political thinker of all times.

Barring a few exceptions, his ideas and logic are sound and can be applied as is to present day problems. Corruption was a big issue during his time, and I can say that nothing much has changed till now. Fragmentation was a threat to security then, it still threatens India and the world today. Religious and dharmic concepts aside, Chanakya, if born today, would be more sophisticated, intelligent and influential than most of us. Taking the surviving writings as a guide to his character, I am only filled with ever increasing respect and admiration for the guy.